纯娱乐：你们说充满电的手柄和没电的手柄哪个重？

该用户已被禁言

MoeVendor 发表于 2016-11-20 22:49
我来用心理学分析下你的行为，这种普遍的行为叫
Confirmation bias ：occurs when an individual searche ...

解释你的心里不用那么高级的词
就俩字 中二

该用户已被禁言

MoeVendor 发表于 2016-11-20 22:37
能量理论上是可以转化成质量，质量也可以转化为能量  这是你摘抄的。那么出来的能量转化为质量后飞走了， ...

化学反应没有质量转化为能量！！！！！！！
是原本在反应分子中的化学能转变为其他能量形式释放了出来！！！！！！！是能量到能量！！！！！
能量以能量形式存在的时候本身没有质量！！！！！！

VitaminRex

事实上…我确实感觉充满电之后重一点
就算实际上锂电池重量不变，充电过程中的静电也会吸附空气中的灰尘导致重一点吧？

zhanghami8

MoeVendor 发表于 2016-11-20 21:49
充电确实可以增加质量，应该是加在形成的化学键上了。你第二个理由简直可笑，你也搞不清质和量了吗？ ...

除非有气体、液体吸收放出，否则不会产生变化。质量与能量不是随便冲个电就能转换的。

该用户已被禁言

zhanghami8 发表于 2016-11-20 22:57
除非有气体、液体吸收放出，否则不会产生变化。质量与能量不是随便冲个电就能转换的。 ...

真是快被中学生逼疯了，自己都没搞懂化学反应的本质是什么，非要把核反应的理论套在化学反应上，真是绝了

MoeVendor

a9vgsux 发表于 2016-11-20 22:52
化学反应没有质量转化为能量！！！！！！！
是原本在反应分子中的化学能转变为其他能量形式释放了出来！ ...

你找什么果壳对吧？我也来找个个人写的。
http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/atombombe
binding energies: nuclei vs. molecules
Not at all. Different process, same calculation: For chemical reactions, there are tiny mass differences as well. To pick an example: When hydrogen and oxygen explosively combine to make water, the sum of the rest masses of the initial hydrogen and oxygen atoms is just a little bit less than the sum of the rest masses of the resulting water molecules. The same is true for the chemical reactions involving spontaneous oxydation - in other words: burning. The same formula applies: The mass difference, multiplied by c2, gives the energy set free during the chemical reaction. Same formula, same conversion factor - yet chemical reactions are much less violent than nuclear explosions. This clearly shows that the difference between nuclear and chemical reactions must be due to something other than E=mc2.

zhanghami8

a9vgsux 发表于 2016-11-20 22:52
化学反应没有质量转化为能量！！！！！！！
是原本在反应分子中的化学能转变为其他能量形式释放了出来！ ...

你别发帖了
看回帖，那位仁兄永远不会服你的，借你爱因斯坦+海森堡你也没法说服他，还是多打几把游戏吧

邪恶社长

肯定是充了电的重好不好，就像你手机装20个app比装10个app重一个道理

MoeVendor

a9vgsux 发表于 2016-11-20 22:59
真是快被中学生逼疯了，自己都没搞懂化学反应的本质是什么，非要把核反应的理论套在化学反应上，真是绝了 ...

来再来一个：还有我是大一的。既然你是高材生，总要看得懂英文吧？
http://www.conservapedia.com/E%3Dmc%C2%B2
Mass is a measure of an object's inertia, in other words its resistance to acceleration. In contrast, the intrinsic energy of an object (such as an atom) is a function of electrostatic charge and other non-inertial forces, having nothing to do with gravity. Declaring the object's energy to be a function of inertia rather than electrostatics is an absurd and impossible attempt to unify the forces of nature, contrary to the accepted view (as predicted by Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge) that the forces of nature have not been unified. Liberal scientists assert the formula E=mc² is not limited to nuclear reactions; it applies to chemical reactions and even to the energy stored in a compressed spring.[8]

MoeVendor

a9vgsux 发表于 2016-11-20 22:59
真是快被中学生逼疯了，自己都没搞懂化学反应的本质是什么，非要把核反应的理论套在化学反应上，真是绝了 ...

http://www.askamathematician.com/2011/03/q-why-does-emc2/
Lots more hypothetical situations require generalisation of this mass energy equation into what is really an equivalence. Any energy type anywhere will equivalently be an inertial and gravitational mass and vice versa. A hot cup of tea loses weight getting lighter very slightly as it loses heat. Chemical reaction products weigh very slightly less than initial reactants for exothermic case. ….it s not only in nuclear reactions though of course the energies are several orders different.
化学反应的本质是核外电子的重新排布。