[PS3]家用機的4xMSAA己經過時了, CELL將更高質素的MLAA帶給戰神3 (與SSAA媲美的) 發

zctang305

PC表示用dolphin玩生化4开4XSSAA很流畅！！！

t.泰丝塔罗莎

CELL被利用的非常不错.........

playmate

看实际效果，其他听听就好。。。

38811054

下面是引用你妻负我于2010-03-04 12:07发表的:
吹不吹年年家用机最佳画面都是ps3拿，某群体想吹也没得吹，只能年年拿乌龟机器来抵抗，结果次次被爆。今年好不容易有了个开发5年的化石游戏挨轮痿客的树木草丛4AA来***，殊不知ps3N年前的GT5P和天剑就4AA了。

看着这些话我就想笑!

38811054

下面是引用发蜜筒于2010-03-04 13:46发表的:


敢问pc上视觉冲击超过战神3的有什么游戏？别跟我提孤岛，论视觉冲击孤岛没得比。

自己去找吧.我pc不行就已笔记本,玩完电视游戏啥的我就满足了.

38811054

下面是引用wrsdtc于2010-03-04 13:56发表的:

你现在说家用机机能不行有意义么？为什么不在05，06年说？大部分主机刚发售时机能绝对可以媲美顶级PC甚至超越，而主机还得考虑成本问题，有这机能已经不错了，你05年的主流PC拿到现在能流畅玩什么游戏？画面比得了360和PS3吗？推一万步讲现在的I7和HD5970过5年后也会变成你口中“机能不行”的货色

科技是进步的不是停止不前的,不要眼光那么短浅,现在的东西就要和现在的东西比,5年后你口中能冒出什么来谁知道,5年前的你和现在的你一样吗

38811054

有人说我pc党 呵呵  我怎么都不知道,  我就知道我只有个笔记本, 基本都是玩TV游戏,还是那句话360和ps3机能伯仲之间,一个档次的东西,有的人非得分割高低,就好像某些人经常说的一句话 "这有意义么",即使ps3机能好于360,360好于ps3 又能好多少,忽略不计到可以,  有些人非得要把自己用的东西提升一个档次,这样好像自己的档次就搞了一节,有了ps3有了ps3又能怎么样比你强的人大有人在,中国最牛逼的就是***,又能耐跟党比

wb3337398

连我党都来了，有意思，伯仲之间却出现UC2这种亚次时代画面的游戏，为什么360没有，画面奖为什么给PS3，比画面当然有意义，一帮人当初对着双平台截图比来比去，现在比不过了来没意义，这算是认输吗。如果没有当初的比画面，至少现在还不至于被抽的这么惨

该用户已被禁言

如果只係單純談論貼圖, 戰神3當然不及CRYSIS這些最強畫面的PC遊戲,
但是論視覺沖擊, CRYSIS遠遠不及戰神3, 那種鏡頭移動, 極大規模的即時演算畫面,
現今沒有一隻PC遊戲比得上...

killbills

那些說吹的要知道
GOW3不是第一隻在PS3 上用MLAA的GAME
之前已有PS3版的Saboteur用過
并因為其AA效果極佳(而且完全是由CELL的SPU處理)
在BEYOND 3D引起了討論

Gosh, PS3 is remarkably smooth. I find that hard to believe! Any ideas how they could pull this off?

It's a technique that needs further explanation! Could a game changer for PS3, if IQ can be achieved that level with SPU cycles.

Who's arranged an interview with Pandemic's chief engineer?!  

The case here isn't how good the AA looks compared to XB360, but how good it looks close up compared to any game.

The green areas are some spots where you can see the AA working perfecty. As someone said earlier in the thread, for these solid colors it looks almost like a line drawing algorithm -- and that's because that's really what it is. Some paper I read even showed that it's closer to perfect coverage than 16 (sparse) sample AA. When it works it's just beautiful.

And the red part shows where I'd expect a morphological post-process to break down completely -- and it does!

Anyway, I really like this (if it is MLAA and I haven't just misidentified it). It's a nice technique in general (that's why I've been dabbling in it on and off for a long time), and the SPUs are almost perfect for it -- you have a lot of calculations on comparatively little data.

I actually tested the demo MLAA code from the paper someone linked, on several images from our game and the results were stunning.
We were planning on implementing 2xMSAA, but after seeing the impressive MLAA results, we will probably implement it to at least prototype stage to see the results in motion and to measure performance. We have some ideas how to do this via the GPU. I'm not sure about some of the details but it might just work.
Let's just say I'll be extremely happy if we can avoid dealing with MSAA