Orbis Roadmap奥比斯蓝图

熊猫物语

观望一下吧                     

awzh

*** 发表于 2013-1-13 18:21
请教下英语的行家“so the overall performance should be a wash”中should be a wash该怎么翻译，这个用法 ...

俚语里wash我知道的有3种截然不同的解释。。第一个是差不多，平衡。第二个是大败。第三个做动词是打败XX的意思。。所以，我觉得写的人明显留了一手。但从syntax来看应该是第一个的意思

该用户已被禁言

看看...............

lalaphin

传闻的真实性不知道，只想说一句，2013年Q4应该是2014年3月前，而不是2013年底。

讴歌123

机能什么的大家都不会差太多的，下世代主要就是投影vs头戴啦……

kenuosuosi

噢！这玩意得多观望观望，才能考虑要不要弄一台。

moriyasana

看来还早................

夏之终结

Sony, Since 2009
-Supercell
-Knight Corner
-then 2011 they decided to choose AMD (remember only with AMD)

MS, since 2008-2009
-Working with AMD-IBM, at least 2 separate team basically 2-3 year ahead of SOny
in working with AMD-IBM,
***t team concentrate on PowerPC based
-2nd team on Buldozer based
-booth team using same GPU building block
-arm based cpu considered too, direct to bus
-supercomputer architecture considered (ex Sun CTO, ex Cray, etc joined MS)

Analyze:
from MS-AMD-IBM starting point , MS invest more and RD more with them (big partner IBM-AMD)
from SOny-AMD starting point, Sony dont have enough time, they choose simple route, to minor modification the basic AMD building block (only AMD)

Software Side:
MS:
MS also heavy research on multi GPU-CPU software stack/custom OS
Basically they readying the software side for multi GPU/CPU scenario
then we see patented Multimedia Computer with QOS
Sony:
Confusing, as IGN developer survey, and Aegis said, i think it is logical, because sony just choosing AMD at 2011, and just like PS3 they lagged behind on Software side

转一个，时间点倒是对上了，SONY明显的准备不足，思路混乱，最后发现时间不够了，只好直接用AMD现成的再小修小补一下了，看来SONY真的不愿意再让MS先发一年。但是相反的，也许定价的压力没有那么大。MS投入的人力物力确实不在一个级别上。

武士刀

awzh 发表于 2013-1-14 00:32
俚语里wash我知道的有3种截然不同的解释。。第一个是差不多，平衡。第二个是大败。第三个做动词是打败XX的 ...

非常感谢您的回复，我对于一些俚语很无解，只能看过后记住了。

light9394

看看再说！！
就是全英文的！！