- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 466
- 威望
- 0 点
- 积分
- 440 点
- 种子
- 48 点
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-26
- 最后登录
- 2024-12-9
|
发表于 2023-3-17 19:00 · 上海
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 fujiejaykobe 于 2023-3-17 19:20 编辑
We know from our original soft-launch period that LG and Sony TVs implement the small compensation cycle differently. They both run it after four hours of total use once the TV is in standby mode, but while LG TVs run the cycle immediately after putting the TV into standby mode, Sony TVs only do so once the TV has been in standby mode for another four hours. This difference means that for the duration of this test, LG TVs will run 21 small compensation cycles per week, while Sony TVs will only run 3. It seems this difference in compensation cycle could explain why we're seeing more image retention, and now burn-in, on the Sony TVs than we are on the LGs. 说的很清楚了 Sony需要待机后另外再等4小时做屏幕像素刷新 这意味着LG测试期间做了21次 而SONY只有三次 所以导致SONY烧屏残影更严重。 不同厂商运用的策略不同导致测试差异。 即便后面加入了48寸LG显示器 采用23小时 每周也只做三次像素刷新,也不能保证三次间隔和SONY电视完全一致。这些因素都会导致测试结果差异。 在形成永久烙印前像素刷新才是有用的。 可能日常使用的话 两者应该不会有什么差异 带散热板的型号肯定会更有优势。 QOLED的确更容易烧屏。 |
|