Eurogamer确认XBOX ONE720P，PS4 900P！***4次时代双机正揭开神秘面纱！

54030354

bbs117 发表于 2013-10-29 22:25

[size=0.83em]2013-10-29 14:16 上传
下载附件 [size=0.83em](39.97 KB)





截些时间差的贴图**有什么意义？

该用户已被禁言

bbs117 发表于 2013-10-29 22:34
这是雾化效果？明明是光照缺失谢谢

XBOX的画面也是光源渲染的问题.....

该用户已被禁言

光照跟AO都分不清，索索们还真是可以了

wxtry

sunxeve 发表于 2013-10-29 22:35
XBOX的画面也是光源渲染的问题.....

你跟他辩这么久干啥。。客观定论早就有了，他爱怎么想你也纠正不过来，没讨论价值。

该用户已被禁言

bbs117 发表于 2013-10-29 22:36
光照跟AO都分不清，索索们还真是可以了

Ambient Occlusion，以下简称AO，中文译名不太好定，有叫“环境光散射”、“环境光吸收”的，如Maya中的Bake AO似乎就一直是译成“烘焙环境吸收贴图”。现今书籍和网络上一般称作“环境光遮蔽”。

该用户已被禁言

720完胜900,OY！！！

该用户已被禁言

sunxeve 发表于 2013-10-29 22:38
Ambient Occlusion，以下简称AO，中文译名不太好定，有叫“环境光散射”、“环境光吸收”的，如Maya中的B ...

没光照哪来的AO？搞清楚谢谢

007007007

XO只能靠调高锐利度来混淆视听了，放开大图一看，啧啧，不说什么了，怎么洗都是黑

godchaos

720p 会比900p 更清楚 , 一点也不科学
原来是gamma在作怪




Digital Foundry 承认弄糟了这次的GAMMA
http://n4g.com/news/1382809/digi ... capature#selcomment
A Digital Foundry employee went on NeoGAF to explain what went wrong with their PS4/Xbox One *** 4 visuals comparison:

Here's what the persons said:

"The issue here is simple; Tom had a limited amount of time to capture this stuff and was not able to do so in a normal environment. If mistakes were made normally, it would be easy to go back and correct, but with the way this worked, it wasn't really possible.

Why so different? DF uses their own hardware for capturing while DICE were handing out Elgato boxes to everyone else. The DF hardware is actually much more capable but it works differently and, without the experience of working with these new consoles, I can see a situation where settings were dialed in wrong.

JackFrags used what DICE provided and probably didn't even attempt to change any settings which, in this case, turned out to be for the best."

大致上是说因为时间限制且不是在正常的环境下作业
之所为何JackFrags的影片不像Digital Foundry的差异之大
如图




因为JackFrags用的设备是DICE所提供
Digital Foundry是用自己的
由于没有用于和次世代主机的经验
所以才会造成这次的状况


难怪IGN的影片也没有出现那么巨大的GAMMA差异

连锐利度这个优势都没了，单纯的DF弄错参数了

该用户已被禁言

还在争啊…………这不明摆着的么，动脑子想想就行了。士官长你真行。