- 精华
- 10
- 帖子
- 2835
- 威望
- 8 点
- 积分
- 3507 点
- 种子
- 2 点
- 注册时间
- 2005-9-25
- 最后登录
- 2019-10-31
|
发表于 2006-5-8 11:45 · 新西兰
|
显示全部楼层
更多资料
Sometimes people think it's one and the same, but more and more it is believed that they are not.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~missgien/arthurian/excalibur.html
It was not the famous "Sword in the Stone" (which broke in battle), but a second sword acquired by the King through the intercession of his druidic advisor, Merddyn (Merlin).
http://www.britannia.com/history/arthur/excalibur.html
The English author, named Sir Thomas Malory (and in the French Suite du Merlin (Prose Merlin), c. 1240), wrote that the sword that Arthur had pulled out of stone was not Excalibur; in fact, Arthur broke his first sword in the fight against King Pellinor. Shortly after, Arthur then received a new sword from the Lady of the Lake, which was explicitly called Excalibur.
http://www.timelessmyths.com/arthurian/excalibur.html |
|