- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 107
- 威望
- 0 点
- 积分
- 113 点
- 种子
- 0 点
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-24
- 最后登录
- 2012-7-5
|
发表于 2006-12-26 05:24 · 美国
|
显示全部楼层
看了国外论坛里的原帖，感觉质疑的人居多，比如下面就是一个典型的质疑－
This thread should be locked soon. Anyone who believes this needs to have their head examined. Even if the structure of the PS3 bios is IDENTICAL to that of the PSP (which is a huge leap and has a 99.99% chance of being wrong), you still would have had to tackle enormous hurdles. If you are telling the truth and have actually wrote a "devhook for PS3", this would mean that in mere days, in the very least you have:
＊ Found a workable exploit in the PS3 bios
＊ Found a way to obtain kernel access though this exploit
＊ Wrote a program that works with the exploit to dump the firmware
＊ Found the encryption keys and decrypted the firmware dump
＊ Hacked the decrypted dump
＊ Wrote a program to flash it back to the PS3 (with no failsafe, so bug = $600 brick)
＊ Cracked all new protection schemes along the way that no one even knows exists yet
Possible? No.
摘要：要想像PSP 那样load ISO image, 先要解密PS3 firmware, 解密 EBOOT loader, 找到PS3 中的某个可以获得 kernel access right 的 bug, 写出重写PS3 firmware 的程序 等等 (实际上除了上面提到的保护机制，大家甚至都不知道 PS3 上究竟还有多少额外保护措施)．原作者后来所发的帖子表明他明显不具备这些基本知识．上面提到这些问题的解决都很困难，而且必然是渐进的，逐个被解决的．PSP破解的思路可以借鉴，但方法不可能照搬（CPU一个是 Cell/PowerPC, 一个是 MIPS, 密钥也肯定不同, PSP 破解可是先在几个月前解决了上述问题，DVEHOOK/UMDLoader/Fasterloader 之类的程序才陆续出现的）估计这又是个想骗注意力的小孩． |
|
川公网安备 51019002005286号
楼主
